Archive for free casino money

Casino Games at Hollywood Park

Posted in Money with casino with tags , , , , , , , , , , on January 27, 2012 by admin

I’m just about to give up on beating the 3/6 games at Hollywood Park. I do win, occasionally, yet lose consistently. I’m very tired of
losing to trash and never being able to bluff. I have studied Winning Low Limit Poker” to death, understand Jones’ concepts and have applied them religiously only to find consistent losses. I have not had a significant winning session in nearly 2 months. I play 6/12 in Vegas but found the 6/12 at HP to be nothing but the same shit play as the 3/6 – just twice as expensive, so I more frequently play the 3/6 when I’m home to avoid the bankroll dents. My question is: If you are a consistent winner at 3/6 (especially here in CA), what tips do you have? Keep in mind that I’m very familiar with the above mentioned concepts.

Answer 1:

I suggest two obvious possibilities for your lack of results:
1) Maybe you simply haven’t played enough sessions to be sure. It is not unusual to have a 2 month cold streak at low limit games -sometimes, it just seems like you can’t catch a hand. I’m not sure how many sessions two months worth is for you, but I have definitely had a few streaks of 20-25 sessions where I had only a handful of winning sessions. (And I beat the hell out of 3-6 in the long run).
2) Perhaps you are going on tilt? Based on your comments, it sounds to me like perhaps you are getting impatient and perhaps loosening up your play when you get frustrated. A typical 3-6 game truly is a waiting game where you simply have to show the best hand at the end. If you’re “tired of losing to trash and never being able to bluff”, you’re maybe playing the wrong game – that’s 3-6 for you. You must resist the temptation to “make things happen” and “let” them happen. (That doesn’t mean things like “don’t ever raise on the come” or “don’t bet the second nuts” – it does mean things like “you’re not going to be able to isolate that bad player pre-flop, and you better learn to recognize it and accept it.”)
So how do you improve your results?
1) Be patient – don’t get out of your game because of bad beats.
If you have to, take a 15 minute walk and come back with a new
attitude. You always want to be playing your best poker.
) In the meantime, work on reading other players – applying the “how to play” concepts of a competent poker book (I haven’t read WLLP, but don’t doubt that it provides solid advice on beating typical Hollywood Park 3-6 games) will only get you so far: eventually you have to start reading players. So pay attention to the other players – look at their eyes, faces, hands, betting motions, and listen to their voices, their words and other noises … try to learn general patterns that many players fall into and try to learn specific things that specific players do. (It’s a good way to keep from going on tilt too – it keeps you busy while you’re folding hand after hand.) Picking up reads is what turns break even “by the book” players into consistent winners.

Answer 2:

Basically laugustine is right, 3/6 is boring because you get to play very few hands and can’t really bluff; not to mention you are fighting against a rake and toke which will be a higher % of your winnings at this limit. If possible try picking loos(er) tables. You still won’t get to play many hands, but your winners should pay you off more.

Answer 3:

Perhaps you might try playing a bit tighter. If you look around the table and don’t see the fish, it’s you. Perhaps you might give more consideration to table selection. I also sometimes play 3-6 (and 6-12) at Hollywood Park and am modestly successful. (But at Omaha – not Texas hold ‘em. I play an average of one hand a round, exclusive of the big blind, which I almost always defend, just so people will not try to steal my big blind.) Sometimes before I get in a game I watch for a while. If I see people making mistakes that I would not make, then I want to join the game. If the game is very tight with few mistakes, unless I want to pay for a lesson, I may decide to do something else.

Difference Between Hold’em and Regular Poker

Posted in Casino history with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on January 27, 2012 by admin

I was playing in a 4-8 holdem game the other day and it was at the showdown where the action was check… check between 2 players. The second player turned his hand over and said,” pair of queens.” The other player threw his hand in face down. A different player asked,” what is that hand?” Yet another player grabs the two facedown cards and turns them up before the dealer can grab and muck them. In this casino there is a retrievable rule (best hand must win). The mucked hand was a loser in this case but what if had actually been able to beat a pair of queens? Can this be a winning hand? The hand never hit the muck so is it live?

Answer 1:

Even though this is a situation involving equal action (check and check) on the river, I’m not exactly sure what you mean by “retrievable rule (best hand must win).” Do you mean that the local rule allows a player to retrieve his hand after he has thrown it away face-down? Or that he can retrieve it even if it has touched the muck? Or that he can retrieve it (by rummaging through the muck) even if it has become mixed with the muck? Or that the dealer may retrieve a hand that has been thrown away face-down? Or that the dealer may retrieve a hand that has been thrown away face-down and has touched the muck? Or that the dealer may retrieve a hand that has become mixed with the muck? Or that any other player at the table (either in the hand or not in the hand) may retrieve a hand that has been thrown away face-down? etc., etc., etc. Or that a floor man may……etc., etc., etc. or that a railbird may……etc., etc., etc.
I cannot conclusively answer your question until you explain what the local “retrievable rule” is. Generally, the only persons who might be entitled to retrieve a hand under this rule are the player himself and the dealer.
Note: the concept of the dealer acting on behalf of a player is anathema to most systems of rules. Generally, the dealer may expose a hand where there has been equal action only upon the request of a player who was in the hand, and then only after the hand has been killed. Generally, if any other player at the table (either in the hand or not in the hand) turns the discarded hand face-up, it is a violation of the “one player to a hand” rule, and such conduct is prohibited. That is, unless this occurred at Carson’s casual catch-as-catch-can card room, in which case the offender would be immediately hired as a shift supervisor.

Answer 2:

If I were the floor called to decide this, I would invoke the 1 player to a hand rule and declare the hand dead (i assume that “threw his hand in face down” meant with the appearance of intending to muck). I would also tell the offending player that he will have to leave if he again interferes with another player’s hand. Messy enough that it is better if it never happens. While it had not hit the
muck, I would enforce the spirit of the rules.

Answer 3:

If the face-down hand did not touch the muck (at the river), then the apparent winning hand may ask to see it and it plays. Players not involved at the river must stay out. Thus, the pair-of-queens had the right to ask to see the hand, but apparently didn’t ask. If the winning hand asked to see the hand, then it plays (it may win, lose, or split the pot depending on card speak). Live losing hands that showdown at the river may also ask to see mucked hands, but those mucked hands do not resurrect. Resurrection of mucked hands only occurs when the winner(s) ask to see them and only when it reasonably possible to retrieve the mucked hands. Asking to see mucked hands is generally considered poor etiquette, and should only be done, IMHO, when there is suspicion of collusion (better to advise a floor man and let him look privately at the mucked hands).

Stud is much more about luck than Hold’Em Casino

Posted in Money with casino with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on January 27, 2012 by admin

Maybe this question has been brought up before but I haven’t seen the answer. I need to know from all you professional card players (50-100 and up), which game has more strategy and more moves. Is it limiting Texas Hold’em with 10 players or is it stud with 8 players???

Answer 1:

I think hold’em has far more moves and strategy, but stud is far more complex and more difficult to fully comprehend and appreciate. The difference lies in the fact that it’s real easy to know what to do in stud, once you know what to do. In hold’em, the possibilities often are endless.

Answer 2:

The big difference between hold’em and stud is that the mechanical skill gap between players in stud is higher than in hold’em. What I mean is that in stud, there is more basic information available to you than in hold’em. This usually makes the correct play easier to select. In hold’em, there is less information, so you can’t always pick the correct play with as much confidence. This causes hold’em to seem much more like a crapshoot than stud is. Some people think this makes hold’em harder. Others think that effectively using ALL the information in stud makes it harder. Either way, I think it is easier for a mediocre player to gain a higher edge in stud (against the fish) than it is in hold’em.

Answer 3:

The majority of Hold’Em hands are decided by the flop. The majority of cards that improve your hand improve your opponent’s hand as well. With only 1,351 possible hands, the game is much more mathematical and, if played well, has a much lower variance.
Stud is much more about luck than Hold’Em.

Hold’em versus Seven Card Stud

Posted in Casino Tips with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on January 27, 2012 by admin

Just a question. In hold’em players are blinded out if they are gone too long from a table. How is that done in seven card stud?

Answer 1:

Ante them out. I’m assuming this is a question for tournament structures, as in a ring game you’d just receive a missed blind button in a flop game, and nothing besides potential rude comments from your opponents in a stud game.

Answer 2:

Some casinos give a button every time a dealer changes (usually about 20 minutes), After two or three dealers, they are pulled.

Answer 3:

The rule is made by the poker room. In a non-tournament game, I’ve seen the first player get 30 minutes, the second one to leave get 15 minutes away before their seat is forfeited. Some rooms have shorter limits if you have a waiting list.

Casino Card Games in Canterbury

Posted in Casino history with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on January 27, 2012 by admin

I have been playing in the 4/8 Omaha 8 or better games at Canterbury park in Shakopee, MN. These games are usually pretty good. They are loose passive with 5-7 players out of nine usually seeing the flop. Normally there is not much raising pre-flop and on any street the most you will usually see is a bet and a raise. Capped betting (5 bets) is a once a night occurrence at best. These are not great games but there is certainly enough poor play to make a tight/tight pre-flop/post-flop strategy profitable. I use the Hutchison point count system for starting hands. I usually do not raise pre-flop unless I am in the blind or on the button or one to the right of the button. I do this because many players will not call with the same horrible hands that they usually play when it is two bets cold and I don’t want to drive out these players. I wonder if I am being a bit too conservative however. Would you raise with a hand like As2s3c7c in early or middle position if you knew that raising would reduce your callers from 6 to 3? Or is it best to limp early and save your raising for situations when you won’t push many people out of the pot. How about high only hands? Would you raise with a KsKcQsJc in early position in hopes of driving out mediocre high hands and scooping the pot if the flop comes high instead of low? I don’t usually raise in any position with a high only hand because they just don’t play very well in O8. Finally, the Hutchinson system recommends raising with hands that total 30 or more. This is very few hands. It seems to me that you could profitably raise a lot more hands, say any hand that garners 24 points or more. Is this reasonable or too aggressive?

Answer 1:

Raising pre-flop in Omaha, especially the loose low limit games, really is not too profitable of an idea. I think Ray Zee explained it best in his book when he states that most Omaha hands run pretty closely and thus pre-flop raising is more likely to result in high fluctuations rather than increased profits. Zee later explains raising as a move primarily done to buy the button and establish position. I think that this philosophy applies well to most Omaha games. Examining your specific hands, the KKQJ and the A237, I’d suggest that you almost never raise with the KKQJ (unless your trying to provide some deception in your play which should not be necessary in most poorly played Omaha games) as the KKQJ is basically a gamble to see a high only flop. It is rather rare that you will scoop a multi-way pot with this hand, and even rarer that you will get heads up in a loose game. Thus sticking to a get in cheap and jam it when favorable philosophy is probably best with that hand. The A237, on the other hand, you don’t mind putting in a lot of money up front, since you will probably lay claim to at least half the pot. Again though, it is a long shot to scoop as you will likely need to make a flush with the ace to grab the high. If your opponents are willing to stick around and draw, don’t bother chasing them out with early raises. Let them in and let them draw to their second nuts. Besides, if you raise and build a big pot before the flop, they may even be correct to chase to their mediocre lows or high hands, and who wants to create opportunities for your weak opponents to play correctly?

Answer 2:

I play in the same games at Canterbury (often waiting for bigger hold- em). I raise every hand I play, and I announce this when I sit down. I figure I have at least one of the best hands at the table, given that I raise the pot every time. On high hands I would prefer to thin the field, though since I raise every time it often does not happen. Oh well. I’ll have to out flop them. Often I raise and fold an unfavourable flop while everyone else is still in, in these games most of your profits will come from advantageous lay downs. Because I am seen as action I often get up to 5 callers on the river. His advice is not the advice I think Ray Zee would give you because you
have to change your style to suit the game. If you have the best or second best hand raise. If you don’t, wait for a better hand.
Answer 3:

A237 is a raise. I don’t worry about knocking people out. Most will groan and throw their two bets in because the truth is that in Omaha the weak players (i.e. most players) will pay 2 bets on the same garbage they’ll pay one bet on. After all, “you don’t have anything ’til you see the flop”. A basic rule in poker is that you can’t generally go wrong wagering more money against a guy with a weaker hand. Just be aware that because of increased variance, you will need a much bigger bankroll to harvest those
extra profits.

No Smoking in the Card Room at Casino Arizona

Posted in Money with casino with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on January 27, 2012 by admin

I don’t want to start a new smoking thread, but I am hearing rumors that Casino Arizona’s poker room will be non smoking effective June 1. Can anyone confirm this? Also, I heard that others, Fort McDowell, for example will soon follow.

Answer 1:

I haven’t heard anything for sure, and I work in the joint, but I have heard that rumor also. Several weeks ago there were short questionnaires being circulated through the room asking about smoking preferences and whether, as a player, *you* would be in favor of a 1 month trial of no smoking…the impression I got from word of mouth was YES. I also heard that all the room here in the immediate area were actually working TOGETHER to implement a non smoking environment at the same time. Just got called to go to a meeting at work, maybe this will be part of it. Ill let you know if they announce it officially to the employees.

Answer 2:

Now that I am an official Phx area observer, I can tell you this. About a month ago myself, Mark P. and Mike B. had an informal meeting where I brought up the idea of us all going non smoking at the same time. Both of them were in agreement and we decided to all look into it with higher ups. Gila is ready to go non smoking if the others will do so at the same time. Now that I am Hustlered, I don’t know exactly what’s going on, but I would guess CA is trying to get the jump now. As for the tournaments, that just isn’t true. BUT, it is something that is not out of the question. It did come up in our little gathering.

Answer 3:

Starting June 1 there will be no smoking in the card room at Casino Arizona at Indian Bend. How it will be accepted remains to be seen, and will determine how permanent the change is. The general consensus/prediction/anticipation/hope is that it will be positive. The property at Mckellips road will remain a smoker friendly environment.

Play on Paradise Poker

Posted in Casino Tips with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on January 27, 2012 by admin

I wonder if is ok to play on paradise poker. If someone goes plus in the long run?

Answer 1:

I’m up an unspectacular amount on Paradise ($400+ in 50 hours over seven weeks). The 2-4 and 3-6 seem 100% legit. The 10-20, well, don’t know and I am not going to risk that much when two guys with a cell phone can clean you out. The payouts are DEFINITELY legit (free, painless, and less than two weeks). Be warned though, the 3-6 is about three times as tough as any 3-6 game in real life. Also, they rake off 5.75% when you buy in (bankroll, not every game), but you get $5 credit for every hundred hands you play, so don’t sweat it. I urge you to try the play money tables. But sadly, most players actually try in the money games. I don’t have anything to do with the operators, and this is just personal experience, but I’ve been pretty happy.

Answer 2:

I went up $600 at the 3/6, 5/10 in two days and cashed out. I periodically went back in with a $100 here and there and lost it. I’ve since deleted the software. It’s WAY TOO EASY to rack up a hefty Visa bill, if you ask me. I’m also little untrusting of the integrity. That’s strictly an opinion and only based on my perception.

Answer 3:

I have played at paradise for 6 months now. At the moment I am 2200 $ up. This comes from playing Hold’em the lower limits (2/4 through 5/10). Beware that your opposition gets much tougher if you move om to 10/20. My best monthly result was in April (Up 1530 $ in 50 hrs of play). I have no hesitation in trusting the integrity of the game. Furthermore I am impressed by the service provided by their support department. The shortest time a check has taken from Costa Rica to Oslo, Norway is three days. Considering that Norway, like Sweden, is basically where Santa lives I find that rather impressive.

Crystal Park- Only Hotel In LA having Casino Card Room

Posted in Money with casino with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on January 27, 2012 by admin

I was thinking of going down to LA (its in LA right?) and living in the crystal park hotel for a while. I head its like 25 dollars a night but that could have been made up. I’m probably going to play like 15-30 holdem give or take……..any advice. 

Answer 1:

Crystal Park used to have a $10 player rate based on playing 5 hours of top section (15-30 or higher). However, they haven’t had a yellow chip game there in weeks, so I suggest you call. You may be able to get the same rate by playing at Hollywood Park (about 15 minutes away), since they are owned by the same company.

Answer 2:

Despite the bad rep Compton has I found the neighborhood around Crystal Park to be one of attractive, well maintained suburban houses whose owners obviously took pride in the. The casino and parking lot are actually pretty isolated from the neighborhood, anyway. In fact, when they first opened (the first time) their address as “Crystal City” to further distance themselves from the rep of Compton. When I stayed there they comped me room and food after the first night. The food was the best I’ve ever had in a casino. They had a weight room and a pool. They don’t serve alcohol, though. One evening I asked a floor man where the nearest place to go pick up a sixpack was. At the time I looked like maybe someone from ZZ Tops idiot cousin, and he said, “Son, you don’t want to be going’ out there after dark”. So anyway, if you can get any kind of decent rate I think it would be a great place to stay for awhile, but bring your own beer.

Answer 3:

Crystal Park is the only hotel in L.A. with a card room. The Seniors will be holding # 7 of The WCOP at the hotel 17-24 October with the Hall of Fame Banquet 24 of October at 6:P.M. The Hotel is as safe as your hometown and Las Vegas if you stay inside the Hotel.