Archive for the Casino history Category

Gambling at Downstream Casino

Posted in Casino history with tags , , , , , , , , , , on January 27, 2012 by admin

The scenario is a 300-600 mixed game that is about 5 or 6 handed. You are now playing Omaha H/L and are dealt A-5-6-8 in the BB. A loose aggressive player raises on the button and the SB calls, I call. Now the flop comes 10-8-7 and the SB checks, what do you do?? You can also assume that the button will raise at least 70% of the time on the flop if you bet.
(1)You can bet and get raised in hopes of knocking the other player out, or you can check and see what develops. If it goes bet/raise you can muck it. Trusted Canadian casino which offer high security for its online gamers such as Vegas Palms Casino.

Also, (2) you could just check call and see if you catch a favorable card.
Or (3) you could just check dump. Which would be your course of action?
I recently had an argument with a high profile player about the correct way to play this hand. This player is one of the world’s best, but I disagree wholeheartedly with the way the hand should be played. I’ll let you know later what I did, and what the high profile player thought I should have done.

Let me start my saying that I know almost nothing about Omaha/8 and even less about what’s inside a typical 300/600 players head – heck I just wanted to type an answer and see what I can come up with. I guess you figured a call was correct because of being shorthanded and in the BB? I’m not sure I play this hand. But, I guess that’s not your question….I think the flop that comes is scary for you; second pair, open-ended-idiot end-type-straight – smallish chance at winning low if it comes – a potential big loser??? I’m thinking the SB is weak. Depending how much respect the button as for you I think you bet only in hopes of folding him, but he’s going to raise 70% of every flop so I probably check/dump at this point and play a better hand against Mr. loose/aggressive when I’m surer I have the best of it. Did you ask yourself what you thought his pre-flop raise meant to you? What do you put him on? Has he been hammering at your BB all night? Maybe a bet and call (if button raises) would be good if the SB folds…then a check/fold on the turn if you get a total blank. Aside from being a rookie here, I think that Mr. High Profile has a big advantage over everyone here if he knows how the button plays……I guess if *you* think he might be on a bluff/steal then a bet/call on the flop is your best option. Look forward to both your thoughts.

You have many decent cards to catch-A23489. No way can you fold. However those cards are a lot better against one than two. I could go into more detail but I think I said enough to show that against a button raiser I would bet.

If you could put him on a hand, you would have to guess some kind of decent low possibility or very good high, or the other option is he has jack shit and you have to worry about your hand. I would bet in hopes the button raises and your heads up. Almost anything that could come doesn’t make you the nuts, but you’re short handed who cares. I would figure my eight to be possibly live; giving me three outs, although your open ended you may prefer the 9 for a high sweeper. But let’s say that is 8 more outs. Other outs are possibilities but it depends on play throughout the hand. And your low could end up being good. Also showing action to an action player is never bad. The way I figure it, if I have 25% of the cards in the deck and the understanding I do of play, and the ability to lay the hand down or take charge given the turn, lets gamble.

Difference Between Hold’em and Regular Poker

Posted in Casino history with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on January 27, 2012 by admin

I was playing in a 4-8 holdem game the other day and it was at the showdown where the action was check… check between 2 players. The second player turned his hand over and said,” pair of queens.” The other player threw his hand in face down. A different player asked,” what is that hand?” Yet another player grabs the two facedown cards and turns them up before the dealer can grab and muck them. In this casino there is a retrievable rule (best hand must win). The mucked hand was a loser in this case but what if had actually been able to beat a pair of queens? Can this be a winning hand? The hand never hit the muck so is it live?

Answer 1:

Even though this is a situation involving equal action (check and check) on the river, I’m not exactly sure what you mean by “retrievable rule (best hand must win).” Do you mean that the local rule allows a player to retrieve his hand after he has thrown it away face-down? Or that he can retrieve it even if it has touched the muck? Or that he can retrieve it (by rummaging through the muck) even if it has become mixed with the muck? Or that the dealer may retrieve a hand that has been thrown away face-down? Or that the dealer may retrieve a hand that has been thrown away face-down and has touched the muck? Or that the dealer may retrieve a hand that has become mixed with the muck? Or that any other player at the table (either in the hand or not in the hand) may retrieve a hand that has been thrown away face-down? etc., etc., etc. Or that a floor man may……etc., etc., etc. or that a railbird may……etc., etc., etc.
I cannot conclusively answer your question until you explain what the local “retrievable rule” is. Generally, the only persons who might be entitled to retrieve a hand under this rule are the player himself and the dealer.
Note: the concept of the dealer acting on behalf of a player is anathema to most systems of rules. Generally, the dealer may expose a hand where there has been equal action only upon the request of a player who was in the hand, and then only after the hand has been killed. Generally, if any other player at the table (either in the hand or not in the hand) turns the discarded hand face-up, it is a violation of the “one player to a hand” rule, and such conduct is prohibited. That is, unless this occurred at Carson’s casual catch-as-catch-can card room, in which case the offender would be immediately hired as a shift supervisor.

Answer 2:

If I were the floor called to decide this, I would invoke the 1 player to a hand rule and declare the hand dead (i assume that “threw his hand in face down” meant with the appearance of intending to muck). I would also tell the offending player that he will have to leave if he again interferes with another player’s hand. Messy enough that it is better if it never happens. While it had not hit the
muck, I would enforce the spirit of the rules.

Answer 3:

If the face-down hand did not touch the muck (at the river), then the apparent winning hand may ask to see it and it plays. Players not involved at the river must stay out. Thus, the pair-of-queens had the right to ask to see the hand, but apparently didn’t ask. If the winning hand asked to see the hand, then it plays (it may win, lose, or split the pot depending on card speak). Live losing hands that showdown at the river may also ask to see mucked hands, but those mucked hands do not resurrect. Resurrection of mucked hands only occurs when the winner(s) ask to see them and only when it reasonably possible to retrieve the mucked hands. Asking to see mucked hands is generally considered poor etiquette, and should only be done, IMHO, when there is suspicion of collusion (better to advise a floor man and let him look privately at the mucked hands).

Casino Card Games in Canterbury

Posted in Casino history with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on January 27, 2012 by admin

I have been playing in the 4/8 Omaha 8 or better games at Canterbury park in Shakopee, MN. These games are usually pretty good. They are loose passive with 5-7 players out of nine usually seeing the flop. Normally there is not much raising pre-flop and on any street the most you will usually see is a bet and a raise. Capped betting (5 bets) is a once a night occurrence at best. These are not great games but there is certainly enough poor play to make a tight/tight pre-flop/post-flop strategy profitable. I use the Hutchison point count system for starting hands. I usually do not raise pre-flop unless I am in the blind or on the button or one to the right of the button. I do this because many players will not call with the same horrible hands that they usually play when it is two bets cold and I don’t want to drive out these players. I wonder if I am being a bit too conservative however. Would you raise with a hand like As2s3c7c in early or middle position if you knew that raising would reduce your callers from 6 to 3? Or is it best to limp early and save your raising for situations when you won’t push many people out of the pot. How about high only hands? Would you raise with a KsKcQsJc in early position in hopes of driving out mediocre high hands and scooping the pot if the flop comes high instead of low? I don’t usually raise in any position with a high only hand because they just don’t play very well in O8. Finally, the Hutchinson system recommends raising with hands that total 30 or more. This is very few hands. It seems to me that you could profitably raise a lot more hands, say any hand that garners 24 points or more. Is this reasonable or too aggressive?

Answer 1:

Raising pre-flop in Omaha, especially the loose low limit games, really is not too profitable of an idea. I think Ray Zee explained it best in his book when he states that most Omaha hands run pretty closely and thus pre-flop raising is more likely to result in high fluctuations rather than increased profits. Zee later explains raising as a move primarily done to buy the button and establish position. I think that this philosophy applies well to most Omaha games. Examining your specific hands, the KKQJ and the A237, I’d suggest that you almost never raise with the KKQJ (unless your trying to provide some deception in your play which should not be necessary in most poorly played Omaha games) as the KKQJ is basically a gamble to see a high only flop. It is rather rare that you will scoop a multi-way pot with this hand, and even rarer that you will get heads up in a loose game. Thus sticking to a get in cheap and jam it when favorable philosophy is probably best with that hand. The A237, on the other hand, you don’t mind putting in a lot of money up front, since you will probably lay claim to at least half the pot. Again though, it is a long shot to scoop as you will likely need to make a flush with the ace to grab the high. If your opponents are willing to stick around and draw, don’t bother chasing them out with early raises. Let them in and let them draw to their second nuts. Besides, if you raise and build a big pot before the flop, they may even be correct to chase to their mediocre lows or high hands, and who wants to create opportunities for your weak opponents to play correctly?

Answer 2:

I play in the same games at Canterbury (often waiting for bigger hold- em). I raise every hand I play, and I announce this when I sit down. I figure I have at least one of the best hands at the table, given that I raise the pot every time. On high hands I would prefer to thin the field, though since I raise every time it often does not happen. Oh well. I’ll have to out flop them. Often I raise and fold an unfavourable flop while everyone else is still in, in these games most of your profits will come from advantageous lay downs. Because I am seen as action I often get up to 5 callers on the river. His advice is not the advice I think Ray Zee would give you because you
have to change your style to suit the game. If you have the best or second best hand raise. If you don’t, wait for a better hand.
Answer 3:

A237 is a raise. I don’t worry about knocking people out. Most will groan and throw their two bets in because the truth is that in Omaha the weak players (i.e. most players) will pay 2 bets on the same garbage they’ll pay one bet on. After all, “you don’t have anything ’til you see the flop”. A basic rule in poker is that you can’t generally go wrong wagering more money against a guy with a weaker hand. Just be aware that because of increased variance, you will need a much bigger bankroll to harvest those
extra profits.

Payouts in a Casino Games

Posted in Casino history with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on January 27, 2012 by admin

From running into the word so many times, I’ve gathered that “presto” means 5-5. Can someone confirm this, and enlighten me as to the origin of this usage of the word?

Answer 1:

“In ancient times, Steve Jacobs would get annoyed when I jumped over several steps in my mathematical derivations or logical arguments and he would write “Presto!” Frank Irwin knew me by sight, and as fate would have it, Frank Irwin, Steve Jacobs, Blair, and I were all in Vegas one weekend. (I had a different name then, before I went into hiding from all the blackjack pit critters getting onto the net. If you are net. sage enough to know the name of the other person involved in the presto story, then you probably know my real name anyway. I was playing single deck at Four Queens, and Frank pointed me out to Steve and Blair, who sat down at my
table, unbeknownst to me. Every time someone at the table got a blackjack, Steve Jacobs yelled “Presto!” This did get me suspicious that it was he. Finally I left the table and so did he and he confessed and we laughed about it with Frank. There was a drunk following us who had done a completely boneheaded play at the table, so I didn’t think it could be a rec.gambler; I was wondering why a boneheaded drunk would be following us around… but I then found out it was Blair! Thereby “presto” on blackjack became the call sign for blackjack playing rec.gamblers. “Irwin?” became the countersign, due to the popularity of his chip in the toilet story and his
involvement in the caper. This was long before the newsgroup split, of course, so the hold’em players heard this story and they wanted their own hand to yell “presto” on. The obvious choices were either AA or AT-AK, but no consensus could be reached. There were several threads posted in which 55 had miraculously won, and people started nominating 55 to be the presto hand. Then I made a post in which 55 miraculously won. At this point Steve Jacobs stepped in and declared 55 the official presto hand. To this day, hundreds of years later, 55 retain the name “presto”, immortalized on BARGE chips just about every year.” – Abdul Jalib (Oct 10, 1999)

Answer 2:

I suppose then that yelling “Presto good!” every time a 5 hits the flop and yelling “Presto no good!” every time a 5 doesn’t hit the flop is a slight misuse of the word… I will try to amend my ways.

Answer 3:

On IRC poker (Gpkr), it seems that some people, when they get AA or KK and get beaten, often say “presto no g00T.” So I thought it meant when a high pocket pair got beaten. Of course, I could be wrong.

Do you leave your chips on the table?

Posted in Casino history with tags , , , , on November 3, 2011 by admin

At a card table when you have to take a pee break, do you leave your chips on the table?  Or do you take them with you? I have only played in casino’s a few times (Trop and Taj).  Sometimes players take them, sometimes they leave them.  Is it safe?  Has anyone ever been light a few chips after a quick bite to eat? Do card rooms have an official policy?

Answer 1:

Where I’ve played, you must keep your chips on the table.  I have not heard or seen a case where some are missing.  But I wouldn’t doubt that it has happened somewhere. What I think is interesting, in the pot limit games like in Tunica and Kinder, they not only have chips on the table but thousands in paper money…..and they leave it all on the table when they take a break.

Answer 2:

I come from the school of thought that says your money is never safer then when it is in chip form.  No tax, and lots of security cameras.  But… i also remember the old saying of a great.  Trust everyone but cut the cards. Seriously though, you can do whatever you want, but the standing rule in most casinos is that you must put back on the table whatever you took off it, if you are to return to play.

Answer 3:

In Atlantic City if you take all of your chips off the table, you will lose your seat.  The chips are what hold your seat.  The same is true if you go to eat.  If you have $500, you can take off part of the money; say 450, but when you return you have to put the $450 back on the table. It is relatively safe to leave money on the table and leave for an hour.